Skip to content
AuditGRC

Camms vs TeamMate+

Updated August 28, 2026 · How we score

Camms (integrated risk, strategy and performance) and TeamMate+ (the long-established internal audit suite) both compete in risk management software. Overall, Camms scores higher in our evaluation (8.0 vs 7.8), while Camms is the stronger regional fit for GCC organisations. The right choice depends on your context — the table below shows exactly where they differ.

Camms

4.0

Best for: Government entities and enterprises that want risk tied to strategy and performance reporting, with real regional support.

TeamMate+

3.9

Best for: Established internal audit departments that want the market's most widely deployed audit suite, with built-in analytics and statistical sampling.

Side-by-side comparison

Camms compared with TeamMate+, attribute by attribute
Attribute Camms TeamMate+
Overall score 8.0 7.8
Functionality 8.0 8.9
Ease of use 8.0 7.0
Value 7.9 7.3
Support 8.1 7.4
GCC fit 7.9 7.8
HQ Adelaide, Australia Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands
Deployment Cloud Cloud (TeamCloud), On-premise
Pricing model Module subscription; mid-market friendly Quote-based, per solution (Audit, Controls, Risk & Compliance)
Free trial No No
Data residency UAE hosting option via regional cloud UAE TeamCloud region (Azure); no KSA or Qatar region advertised
Arabic support Yes Yes
Regional presence Dubai office; government and enterprise clients in UAE, KSA, Qatar EMEA served from London, no Gulf office listed; vendor names customers in Qatar, the UAE and Saudi Arabia
Framework content ISO 31000, ISO 27001, GCC government risk frameworks IIA standards, SOX, ISO 27001, NIST CSF

Camms: strengths and trade-offs

  • Genuine Middle East presence and Arabic support
  • Strategy-risk-performance linkage is distinctive
  • Strong dashboards and board reporting
  • Compliance framework automation is lighter than specialists
  • Riskonnect acquisition creates roadmap uncertainty

TeamMate+: strengths and trade-offs

  • TeamMate Analytics includes statistical sampling (monetary unit, attribute, stratified) and a large audit test library
  • UAE cloud hosting region on Azure for Middle East data residency
  • Arabic is among the 19 supported interface languages
  • Independent reviews describe a dated, clunky interface with a steep learning curve
  • Report generation and dashboard customisation are recurring complaints in user reviews

Bottom line

Choose Camms if: government entities and enterprises that want risk tied to strategy and performance reporting, with real regional support.

Choose TeamMate+ if: established internal audit departments that want the market's most widely deployed audit suite, with built-in analytics and statistical sampling.