LogicGate Risk Cloud vs Workiva

Updated July 30, 2026 · How we score

LogicGate Risk Cloud (no-code risk and compliance workflows) and Workiva (connected reporting, SOX and audit) both compete in compliance software. Overall, Workiva scores higher in our evaluation (7.6 vs 7.6), while Workiva is the stronger regional fit for GCC organisations. The right choice depends on your context — the table below shows exactly where they differ.

Side-by-side comparison

LogicGate Risk Cloud compared with Workiva, attribute by attribute

Attribute	LogicGate Risk Cloud	Workiva
Overall score	7.6	7.6
Functionality	8.4	8.7
Ease of use	8.5	8.2
Value	7.8	7.0
Support	8.0	8.2
GCC fit	5.2	5.8
HQ	Chicago, USA	Ames, USA
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Pricing model	Subscription by application and users	Solution-based subscription (premium)
Free trial	No	No
Data residency	US/EU hosting only	US/EU hosting
Arabic support	No	No
Regional presence	None; remote coverage	Growing via EMEA team; partners for ESG reporting
Framework content	SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, GDPR	SOX, ESG (ISSB/GRI), IFRS reporting

LogicGate Risk Cloud: strengths and trade-offs

• ✓Genuinely flexible no-code workflow builder
• ✓Graph model links risks, controls and issues naturally
• ✓Faster implementation than legacy enterprise suites
• ✕No GCC hosting, Arabic support or regional content
• ✕Build-it-yourself flexibility means design effort up front

Workiva: strengths and trade-offs

• ✓Unrivalled connected document-spreadsheet reporting
• ✓Strong SOX and ESG content
• ✓Excellent multi-author control and audit trail
• ✕Not a full GRC suite — risk and audit depth is limited
• ✕Premium pricing

Bottom line

Choose LogicGate Risk Cloud if: teams that want to tailor their own GRC workflows without code or heavy consulting.

Choose Workiva if: listed companies and SOX/ESG reporting teams needing controlled, multi-author documents linked to live data.